I have written before about the pleasure that is breakfast on a weekend. A self-indulgent feast to counteract the daily drudgery of cereal. A few weeks ago, we decided that we would have breakfast at the central Oxford branch of Patisserie Valerie. Although neither of us are huge fans of national chains, the cakes in the window were rather seductive. Sadly appearances can be deceptive.
Things started with moderate promise. As well as cakes, the menu had a fry up on it. Admittedly it was a fry-up costing eight quid; a bit steep if you ask me. However, it showed that there were at least decent ingredients on the premises; specifically bacon and bread. You may see where this is going. A bacon sandwich seemed like a distinct possibility. All good so far. Unfortunately things didn't turn out to be that simple. I started my request with a suitably sheepish, "I know it's not strictly speaking on the menu but..." My request for a bacon sandwich was met with a look of such confused blankness that I began to think I had asked for a pollonium-cooked paving slab in some obscure conversational Zwahili dialect. Eventually I was told that a bacon sandwich was impossible in a tone that questioned why anyone would want such a thing ever! This didn't endear the place much. How hard can it be? Bacon, bread, a bit of butter and maybe some brown sauce. It doesn't take a Michelin star. It doesn't even really take opposable thumbs. Given the cooks in the building can prepare a fry up, a bacon sandwich shouldn't be beyond their ability.To add insult to injury I was then helpfully informed that they have bacon, lettuce and tomato sandwiches.
Oh wait, so they can place some bacon between bread. They just need superfluous pollution too. Or maybe it's hot ingredients that prove a problem. A sharp kick on the shin from my other-half prevented me asking for a B.L.T. minus the L. and the T.
Grumblingly I settled for my pastry staple, a pain aux chocolate. All I can say is that I wish I hadn't bothered. Sometimes hunger can be the preferable alternative. We were given virtually no option about having our pastries heated. They were being given their blast in the microwave whether we liked it or not. Sadly this did little to conceal the fact that they tasted like they had been sitting on a shelf for at least a day and had then been dropped in cement. If you think all of this is sour grapes about my beloved bacon sandwich then I can confirm that my girlfriend found her pastry almost inedible too.
So to recap, my preferred choice wasn't available and the backup option was distinctly unpalatable. A saving grace would be that it was cheap but there was no such luck there either. Two hot drinks and a couple of pastries cost nearly fifteen quid. A bit steep in anybody's books especially given the poor service and the disappointing food.
I would like to report some mitigating features to recommend this place but unfortunately I can't. We didn't even get the the bill quickly thus delaying our escape to pastures more fun.
My honest advice; if you're walking past a Patisserie Valerie and fancy a snack, keep walking. You might be lucky and find a bit of rubble or some old cigarette butts to nibble on.
TFB
Wednesday, 4 December 2013
Saturday, 30 November 2013
Haggis, Neeps and Tatties
Today is St. Andrew's day; the patron Saint of Scotland (amongst a few other places). To mark this I will be wearing my kilt but that doesn't really have much of a place in a food blog so I thought I would share my recipe for the most traditional of Scottish deelicacies... haggis, neeps and tatties.
For the uninitiated, haggis is a small hairy creature with legs shorter on one side than on the other. This allows them to run round hills more easily. Obviously male haggises (haggi) have legs shorter on one side and female on the other allowing them to meet half way round the hill.
Back in the real world, it is a dish of sheep offal, oatmeal, onions and spices. On paper I'll admit, this isn't the most enticing of combinations however most people are converts on tasting. With an open mind, it is the perfect hearty dish for these ever colder winter evenings. If you're looking to buy some then it can be found in many good butchers and some good supermarkets such as Waitrose. I recommend McSweens as the best to go for. To get the best results I usually stand it in about 2 inches of water in a baking tray, add a wee sploosh of whisky then cover it with tinfoil and cook in a medium-hot oven for about an hour.
Tatties are potatoes, ideally mashed. For best results I infuse the milk for the mashing with the potato skins and simmer the butter gently until it goes a lovely nut-brown colour. It is also worth rinsing the chopped potatoes a few times under running water to remove some of the starch.
For the neeps I generally use mashed swede. This does tend to have a bit of a watery flavour if not treated carefully. For that reason I tend to mix in some chopped parsnips to add a bit of flavour and texture. I also only use butter for the mashing.
Finally, to finish all this off, a Balmoral sauce does the job nicely. Around 300ml of lamb stock simmered until it is thick and viscous with a glass of white wine, whisky (naturally), some lemon juice and a tablespoon of good quality heather honey with a few twists of black pepper will make the perfect sauce. The quantities can be played with until the desired flavour and consistency have been achieved.
Obviously, to finish all of this properly a whisky is required. I think on this occasion, depending on the weather, either an Aberlour 10 year old or an Arran 10 year old should hit the spot nicely!
Sliante
TFB
Tuesday, 26 November 2013
Whisky Gifts
It's that time of year again. Mass hysteria has descended over the general population like the first frost of winter. Suddenly the question on everybody's lips is, "What can I get... ?" insert person of choice. Special offers are raided, fellow shoppers elbowed aside and general grumpiness levels rise (well mine anyway).
Eventually thoughts will turn either in inspiration or desperation to whisky. There's a flash of relief as you remember that old Uncle Alec likes a dram.... or at least seems the sort that does. Not only that but a bottle of whisky has a certain grace and elegance to it. Gravitas even. Not only that, it doesn't take up too much space, looks good on the sideboard and, barring the more collectible expressions, is the perfect sort of price.
So you've decided on a bottle. Now the big question is which one? Generally if it's wet and tastes of whisky it will go down well but let's assume you're planning on being reasonably adventurous and go for a malt. You could of course go for one of the Glens; Glenfiddich, Glenmorangie or Glen Livet. Between them they make up a significant percentage of single malt production in Scotland. All have their own strengths as whiskys and will provide an enjoyable drink. However if you're buying a bottle I suspect you want to go for something a "bit different"; something special that will make an impression.
There are of course endless obscure expressions that can impress and titillate a connoisseur but they are hard to get hold of and invariably expensive. If you're not buying for a connoisseur then (if you have any sort of conscience) you won't want to run the risk of it being diluted with coke!
Fortunately there is one particular expression that ticks all the boxes in my book. A bottle that will satisfy even a demanding aficionado but will equally provide a nice drink to someone who doesn't drink a lot of whisky. It has a lovely, complex flavour that can be savoured and de-constructed but equally, it tastes of whisky. Dram after a meal? No problem, this is robust enough to be enjoyed. Equally, it's light enough to be had on it's own on a winter afternoon. It also has the geeky trivia-value of being from the most northern (legal) whisky distillery in the world.
The bottle in question? Highland Park 12 year old.
So give it a try; either a bottle of festive cheer and goodwill for yourself or as a gift. Either way, I hope you enjoy it.
Sliante
TFB
Eventually thoughts will turn either in inspiration or desperation to whisky. There's a flash of relief as you remember that old Uncle Alec likes a dram.... or at least seems the sort that does. Not only that but a bottle of whisky has a certain grace and elegance to it. Gravitas even. Not only that, it doesn't take up too much space, looks good on the sideboard and, barring the more collectible expressions, is the perfect sort of price.
So you've decided on a bottle. Now the big question is which one? Generally if it's wet and tastes of whisky it will go down well but let's assume you're planning on being reasonably adventurous and go for a malt. You could of course go for one of the Glens; Glenfiddich, Glenmorangie or Glen Livet. Between them they make up a significant percentage of single malt production in Scotland. All have their own strengths as whiskys and will provide an enjoyable drink. However if you're buying a bottle I suspect you want to go for something a "bit different"; something special that will make an impression.
There are of course endless obscure expressions that can impress and titillate a connoisseur but they are hard to get hold of and invariably expensive. If you're not buying for a connoisseur then (if you have any sort of conscience) you won't want to run the risk of it being diluted with coke!
Fortunately there is one particular expression that ticks all the boxes in my book. A bottle that will satisfy even a demanding aficionado but will equally provide a nice drink to someone who doesn't drink a lot of whisky. It has a lovely, complex flavour that can be savoured and de-constructed but equally, it tastes of whisky. Dram after a meal? No problem, this is robust enough to be enjoyed. Equally, it's light enough to be had on it's own on a winter afternoon. It also has the geeky trivia-value of being from the most northern (legal) whisky distillery in the world.
The bottle in question? Highland Park 12 year old.
So give it a try; either a bottle of festive cheer and goodwill for yourself or as a gift. Either way, I hope you enjoy it.
Sliante
TFB
Saturday, 9 November 2013
Restaurant Review: The Waterside Inn Bray
It was the third anniversary of my girlfriend and I getting together and what better way to for two budding foodies to celebrate a special occasion than by going out for a meal? More in hope than in faith we applied (yes applied) for table reservations at the Waterside Inn. The other three Michelin starred restaurant in Bray.
Much to our surprise, our application was successful so on the day of our anniversary we packed into the car and headed off to Bray. When we got there, we encountered the first issue of the night. Valet parking. In front of us was a fleet of Audis, behind a queue of Range Rovers. We however were in a Corsa. A pink Corsa. Needless to say, we felt a wee bit out of place. The parking attendant did however have the good grace to keep a straight face... just!
We got in and were greeted in hushed, deferential tones although it was not immediately clear whether these were directed at us or the institution. In the waiting room we were presented with menus, canapés and a drink.
Fairly quickly I decided that the tasting menu was the order of the day. So far so good. Unfortunately, when I highlighted my egg allergy, things started to go a bit wrong. I thought that, as dishes with eggs were highlighted on the menu, the kitchen would be well versed in mitigating their use. Apparently not. The waiter seemed rather flummoxed and unsettled by my revelation. Ultimately this resulted in me getting most of the dishes but some were missing elements. This I could cope with but where I felt really let down were the dessert courses. My first was substituted with a cheese board which wasn't entirely bad news. The second was substituted with a plate of fruit. This was more suitable to places where Michelins are fitted rather than awarded. Given Roux is a noted pastry chef amongst his other talents, I expected better. I was similarly let down by the petit fours with coffee. Four rather bland fruit jellies were hardly a substitute and left me feeling distinctly fobbed off.
What didn't help was a bit of a language barrier. Having a degree in Biology along with living with food allergies for 27 years means I have come to understand allergies rather well. If I hear how eggs feature in a dish, I usually have a fairly good idea how I will react to them (as well as having a decent chance of explaining why). Unfortunately the waiter and I couldn't find a common language for me to say this so in the end, I gave up.
So beyond that, how was the rest of the food? If I were to sum it up in one sentence it would be: nice but uninspiring. My lobster starter was delicious but spoiled by the heap of green stuff that looked like it had come straight out of a supermarket salad bag and gave the dish the feel of being served in a greasy-spoon "caff" rather than a world renowned restaurant. Next was a very tasty chestnut and champagne veloute with a lovely mouth-feel and mine was served without the foie gras. However it was a bit on the heavy side for something so early in the meal. Next up was an halibut which was beautifully cooked and had a wonderful texture. Finally was the duck which was a bit of an highlight. Beautifully flavoured and succulently tender, it was extremely satisfying. There was a decent amount of duck on the plate too.
So why uninspiring? Each of the dishes were well presented and tasty but none of them were truly mind-blowing. To my mind that's what one should be getting in a three star restaurant. The heavy use of ingredients like foie gras, caviar and truffle gave the meal and air of decadence but also the impression of "posh food by numbers". Nothing was enormously surprising nor terribly exciting. The general sense of disaffection was brought to a head by the prices. Nobody expects a three star restaurant to be cheap but the prices we were charged were verging on the piss-taking. Fifty quid for a main course. Really? We both agreed that for the sort of money we paid we were expecting a meal that we would be talking about for years to come. We were prepared to pay lots but what we did pay, didn't represent value.
Unfortunately the service didn't do a lot to counteract our general dissatisfaction. The restaurant was very well staffed but this lead to lots of people milling about trying to look busy. This in turn created a bustling atmosphere which was extremely unsettling. There was also lots of duplication of tasks. I got asked about my wine three times by three separate people before I had even had a chance to taste it (and anybody that knows me will know that it doesn't take me long to get stuck into a drink). This was after the sommelier looked slightly perplexed when I asked for his recommendations for wine to go with my meal. Throughout the meal we were interrogated as to the food often mid-mouthful or half way through a sentence making it extremely difficult either to enjoy the meal or relax and enjoy each other's company.
I did like the bread basket though. It was made out of beautifully baked and glazed dough.
In conclusion, I really can't recommend going here unless you desperately want to go to a three star restaurant that's not in London and you don't like the idea of the Fat duck While the food is certainly delicious, it does not justify the price charged. Meals of similar quality can be obtained elsewhere for a more reasonable price. Other venues also have far more personality and soul rather than a rather stiff routine that felt in hindsight like a bit of a gastronomic conveyor belt.
TFB
Much to our surprise, our application was successful so on the day of our anniversary we packed into the car and headed off to Bray. When we got there, we encountered the first issue of the night. Valet parking. In front of us was a fleet of Audis, behind a queue of Range Rovers. We however were in a Corsa. A pink Corsa. Needless to say, we felt a wee bit out of place. The parking attendant did however have the good grace to keep a straight face... just!
We got in and were greeted in hushed, deferential tones although it was not immediately clear whether these were directed at us or the institution. In the waiting room we were presented with menus, canapés and a drink.
Fairly quickly I decided that the tasting menu was the order of the day. So far so good. Unfortunately, when I highlighted my egg allergy, things started to go a bit wrong. I thought that, as dishes with eggs were highlighted on the menu, the kitchen would be well versed in mitigating their use. Apparently not. The waiter seemed rather flummoxed and unsettled by my revelation. Ultimately this resulted in me getting most of the dishes but some were missing elements. This I could cope with but where I felt really let down were the dessert courses. My first was substituted with a cheese board which wasn't entirely bad news. The second was substituted with a plate of fruit. This was more suitable to places where Michelins are fitted rather than awarded. Given Roux is a noted pastry chef amongst his other talents, I expected better. I was similarly let down by the petit fours with coffee. Four rather bland fruit jellies were hardly a substitute and left me feeling distinctly fobbed off.
What didn't help was a bit of a language barrier. Having a degree in Biology along with living with food allergies for 27 years means I have come to understand allergies rather well. If I hear how eggs feature in a dish, I usually have a fairly good idea how I will react to them (as well as having a decent chance of explaining why). Unfortunately the waiter and I couldn't find a common language for me to say this so in the end, I gave up.
So beyond that, how was the rest of the food? If I were to sum it up in one sentence it would be: nice but uninspiring. My lobster starter was delicious but spoiled by the heap of green stuff that looked like it had come straight out of a supermarket salad bag and gave the dish the feel of being served in a greasy-spoon "caff" rather than a world renowned restaurant. Next was a very tasty chestnut and champagne veloute with a lovely mouth-feel and mine was served without the foie gras. However it was a bit on the heavy side for something so early in the meal. Next up was an halibut which was beautifully cooked and had a wonderful texture. Finally was the duck which was a bit of an highlight. Beautifully flavoured and succulently tender, it was extremely satisfying. There was a decent amount of duck on the plate too.
So why uninspiring? Each of the dishes were well presented and tasty but none of them were truly mind-blowing. To my mind that's what one should be getting in a three star restaurant. The heavy use of ingredients like foie gras, caviar and truffle gave the meal and air of decadence but also the impression of "posh food by numbers". Nothing was enormously surprising nor terribly exciting. The general sense of disaffection was brought to a head by the prices. Nobody expects a three star restaurant to be cheap but the prices we were charged were verging on the piss-taking. Fifty quid for a main course. Really? We both agreed that for the sort of money we paid we were expecting a meal that we would be talking about for years to come. We were prepared to pay lots but what we did pay, didn't represent value.
Unfortunately the service didn't do a lot to counteract our general dissatisfaction. The restaurant was very well staffed but this lead to lots of people milling about trying to look busy. This in turn created a bustling atmosphere which was extremely unsettling. There was also lots of duplication of tasks. I got asked about my wine three times by three separate people before I had even had a chance to taste it (and anybody that knows me will know that it doesn't take me long to get stuck into a drink). This was after the sommelier looked slightly perplexed when I asked for his recommendations for wine to go with my meal. Throughout the meal we were interrogated as to the food often mid-mouthful or half way through a sentence making it extremely difficult either to enjoy the meal or relax and enjoy each other's company.
I did like the bread basket though. It was made out of beautifully baked and glazed dough.
In conclusion, I really can't recommend going here unless you desperately want to go to a three star restaurant that's not in London and you don't like the idea of the Fat duck While the food is certainly delicious, it does not justify the price charged. Meals of similar quality can be obtained elsewhere for a more reasonable price. Other venues also have far more personality and soul rather than a rather stiff routine that felt in hindsight like a bit of a gastronomic conveyor belt.
TFB
Monday, 4 November 2013
Party Planning
It was my mother's birthday recently. It is amazing how often she turns 21 (not least because I'm 27)! As part of the celebrations I (ably assisted by my girlfriend who was indulging her inner Pippa Middleton) put on a small "do" for her with her, my dad and a family friend with associated sprogs and dogs.
Naturally your friendly food blogger spent a considerable amount of time planning a key element; the food. After scrolling through numerous options for individually prepared dishes, I eventually settled for two big dishes that guests could help themselves to and eventually end up suitably stuffed. Even better (and a feature of luck rather than good planning) both dishes could be served with rice minimising the amount of prep. needed.
My first dish was a curry; an almost universal favourite. A korma was my eventual choice since it is rich and flavoursome without being too spicy. Critically it can also be prepared in bulk and in advance. I'm pleased to report that it was so popular that the pot was virtually licked clean.
My next dish was something of my own creation; beef beerginion. Sorry, it is a pun. My sense of humour is that clunking. The dish, as you may have guessed, is my take on a beef bourginion but made with copious volumes of beer rather than red wine. It simmers down to a beautiful, rich dish. Again this can be made in advance and in sufficient quantities to feed a medium-sized squadron (or my lot and a hungry dog).
I'm pleased to say that both dishes went down a storm.
Desserts were handled by my girlfriend; the one with the sweet tooth that I may have mentioned. The menu consisted of a delicious cheesecake, a birthday cake and (best of all in my opinion) a syrup dumpling. With that on offer, elasticated waistbands seem less like a sartorial slight and more like a vital necessity. All of this was finished off by some cupcakes beautifully decorated with poppies; my mum's favourite flower. These were done by my girlfriend's cousin who has an incredible talent when it comes to cupcakes and icing.
Key to all of this was one basic principle handed down from my mother and her mother before her; make sure that nobody was anything less than absolutely stuffed. Pancakes the next morning made this effect last well into the next day. Oh and some rolls and sausage for those that could stomach it.
Not only was spoiling my mother good fun. I enjoyed cooking for lots of people too. Much as I don't like planning, cooking is the exception that proves the rule. The challenge of cooking of cooking for a variety of ages and tastes is not one to be underestimated and extremely rewarding when it works out.
Most of all, both my girlfriend and I have learned one vital lesson which I will pass on to you now. When entertaining for crowds, paper plates are an absolute god-send. Washing up is minimised and we had more time to enjoy the party!
TFB
Friday, 11 October 2013
"I Don't Like Whisky"
The above quote is one I often hear when drawn into discussion on my passion for the water of life. Usually I meet this with the kind of look one would give a passing Martian and a blunt, grunted, "Why?"
There are two main reasons people give for their dislike. The first is a "bad experience" in their youth. Usually this involves a party, far too much mass produced spirit from a foreign climate and often a questionable choice of romantic partner or sleeping location. Often the headache afterwards is also cited as an excuse. To these people I say grow some backbone. Youth is meant to be blighted with silliness and questionable choices. Don't let too much of a bad decision put you off a lifetime of pleasure. As Oscar Wilde said, "Everything in moderation, including moderation!"
The other main reason given is not liking the experience of drinking whisky. "It burns" is a common reaction. In that case, may I suggest cutting it with a wonderful substance (and key ingredient of whisky itself) water. Naturally, Scottish spring water is the best but in the absence of this, there's plenty of the stuff in the tap! A few drops should be enough to extinguish the worst of the fire but if you want a really easy-drinking experience then I suggest adding equal measures of whisky and water. Going off on a tangent; I have recently developed a taste (probably on the back of re-reading the Bond novels) for whisky and soda. The slight bitterness of the soda offsets the richness of the whisky nicely. This is best saved for the cheaper blends though.
Of course, beyond the sensation of drinking, there are some people who claim that they dislike the taste. Usually they are in the company of those in the above paragraph; they have only really experienced poor quality whiskies or certainly ones that are not to their taste. Scotland may be a relatively small country but the diversity of flavours in the whisky is really quite astonishing. Not liking the flavour of whisky simply means not having tasted enough.
To get an understanding of the flavours available, one needs to understand a bit about the region the whisky comes from. The Scottish Whisky Association defines a whisky region as an area with three or more distilleries. In practical terms this translates to Speyside, Highland, Lowland, Island and Islay although I (and many others) would also argue that Cambletown should also be classified as a unique region. Although it only has two distilleries, the whisky produced is delicious and has some unique characteristics. However, working within the official definitions, there are still some tangible regional markers that can be used to get an idea of what a whisky will be like.
Let's start with Speyside. As the name suggests, Speyside distilleries are the ones that border the river Spey in the North East. They are noted for their light, fruity characteristics and cover giants of the whisky industry like Glenfiddich and Glenlivet. These whiskies are regarded by some connoisseurs as the best in the world.
Next are the Highland whiskies. They tend to be sweeter in character and have a smoother, creamier mouth-feel (for example Edradour). Most highland whiskies can also be found in the East of the country.
Lowland whiskies on the other hand can be found throughout the central belt of Scotland and on into the borders. These have a dry, cerial-like quality with some people describing the flavours as almost grassy. The lowland region is also home to the only distillery in Scotland that distils it's spirit three times rather than the more conventional two. This gives the whisky a particularly smooth character.
Island whiskies, as the name suggests, are produced on the Scottish islands. Given the geographical diversity of the islands, it probably won't be a huge surprise to find out that there is also a fair range of flavours in the whisky. However the dominant flavours are smoky and peaty ones with several being quite sweet too.
The final category is Islay. Although Islay is an island, the sheer number of distilleries on it combined with their truly unique style had marked Islay out as a separate region. Whiskies from here are usually very smoky and very peaty. There is also a very salty quality; almost like seaweed being used to scent the room. They are the perfect fireside whiskies but not for the feint-hearted.
All of the descriptions I have given you so far are fairly vague and broad (not to mention entirely subjective). Naturally there is considerable variation in the flavours of the whiskies produced within a region. Otherwise, where would the fun be? The descriptions are however useful in narrowing down choices when trying to find whiskies for somebody's taste. Giving someone with a sweet tooth an Islay whisky would be a mistake! Similarly, giving someone who like dry flavours a whisky from Speyside or the Lowlands probably isn't your best bet (unless your guest is as awkward as I am. For some reason I prefer savoury flavours to eat and dry flavours to drink but most of my favourite whiskies are at the sweeter end of the spectrum).
Net outcome of this post; I urge you to go out and try as many whiskies from different regions as possible. You will see that these generalisations have some truth.
Sliante.
TFB
There are two main reasons people give for their dislike. The first is a "bad experience" in their youth. Usually this involves a party, far too much mass produced spirit from a foreign climate and often a questionable choice of romantic partner or sleeping location. Often the headache afterwards is also cited as an excuse. To these people I say grow some backbone. Youth is meant to be blighted with silliness and questionable choices. Don't let too much of a bad decision put you off a lifetime of pleasure. As Oscar Wilde said, "Everything in moderation, including moderation!"
The other main reason given is not liking the experience of drinking whisky. "It burns" is a common reaction. In that case, may I suggest cutting it with a wonderful substance (and key ingredient of whisky itself) water. Naturally, Scottish spring water is the best but in the absence of this, there's plenty of the stuff in the tap! A few drops should be enough to extinguish the worst of the fire but if you want a really easy-drinking experience then I suggest adding equal measures of whisky and water. Going off on a tangent; I have recently developed a taste (probably on the back of re-reading the Bond novels) for whisky and soda. The slight bitterness of the soda offsets the richness of the whisky nicely. This is best saved for the cheaper blends though.
Of course, beyond the sensation of drinking, there are some people who claim that they dislike the taste. Usually they are in the company of those in the above paragraph; they have only really experienced poor quality whiskies or certainly ones that are not to their taste. Scotland may be a relatively small country but the diversity of flavours in the whisky is really quite astonishing. Not liking the flavour of whisky simply means not having tasted enough.
To get an understanding of the flavours available, one needs to understand a bit about the region the whisky comes from. The Scottish Whisky Association defines a whisky region as an area with three or more distilleries. In practical terms this translates to Speyside, Highland, Lowland, Island and Islay although I (and many others) would also argue that Cambletown should also be classified as a unique region. Although it only has two distilleries, the whisky produced is delicious and has some unique characteristics. However, working within the official definitions, there are still some tangible regional markers that can be used to get an idea of what a whisky will be like.
Let's start with Speyside. As the name suggests, Speyside distilleries are the ones that border the river Spey in the North East. They are noted for their light, fruity characteristics and cover giants of the whisky industry like Glenfiddich and Glenlivet. These whiskies are regarded by some connoisseurs as the best in the world.
Next are the Highland whiskies. They tend to be sweeter in character and have a smoother, creamier mouth-feel (for example Edradour). Most highland whiskies can also be found in the East of the country.
Lowland whiskies on the other hand can be found throughout the central belt of Scotland and on into the borders. These have a dry, cerial-like quality with some people describing the flavours as almost grassy. The lowland region is also home to the only distillery in Scotland that distils it's spirit three times rather than the more conventional two. This gives the whisky a particularly smooth character.
Island whiskies, as the name suggests, are produced on the Scottish islands. Given the geographical diversity of the islands, it probably won't be a huge surprise to find out that there is also a fair range of flavours in the whisky. However the dominant flavours are smoky and peaty ones with several being quite sweet too.
The final category is Islay. Although Islay is an island, the sheer number of distilleries on it combined with their truly unique style had marked Islay out as a separate region. Whiskies from here are usually very smoky and very peaty. There is also a very salty quality; almost like seaweed being used to scent the room. They are the perfect fireside whiskies but not for the feint-hearted.
All of the descriptions I have given you so far are fairly vague and broad (not to mention entirely subjective). Naturally there is considerable variation in the flavours of the whiskies produced within a region. Otherwise, where would the fun be? The descriptions are however useful in narrowing down choices when trying to find whiskies for somebody's taste. Giving someone with a sweet tooth an Islay whisky would be a mistake! Similarly, giving someone who like dry flavours a whisky from Speyside or the Lowlands probably isn't your best bet (unless your guest is as awkward as I am. For some reason I prefer savoury flavours to eat and dry flavours to drink but most of my favourite whiskies are at the sweeter end of the spectrum).
Net outcome of this post; I urge you to go out and try as many whiskies from different regions as possible. You will see that these generalisations have some truth.
Sliante.
TFB
Saturday, 5 October 2013
The Lamb
We were lost. Very, very lost. Looking for a small country lane deep in the Oxfordshire countryside was not an easy undertaking. We eventually found where we were looking for but more interestingly, from the point of view of this post, we also stumbled across a rather charming country pub. The pub in question was the Lamb in Little Milton.
It first attracted out attention by virtue of the fact that it had a thatched roof. Quaint to the point of cliché but still rather fun. It appeared to be the social hub of a small community consisting largely of thatched buildings.
Initially we just went in for drinks. Inside I was delighted to find good ale at a reasonable price. More importantly, it had a warm and friendly atmosphere. However, while the inside was lovely, the real show-stopper was the outside. As well as the thatched roof and the ample car park there is an absolutely gorgeous garden complete with some very friendly rabbits (whose numbers bear no relation to the specials board). In the summer it's a glorious place to spend some time with a couple of pints.
Like our first contact with the Black Prince, our first contact was enough to have us wanting more. If the settings and drinks weren't enough, the menu was positively seductive. It has subsequently become a firm favourite and one of our regular haunts
Now on to the food bit; it's spectacular. Good, hearty country fare was the order of the day. It was beautifully cooked and elegantly presented. Better still, the portions were huge. There's no chance of still feeling hungry at the end of your meal! Style-wise; it is best described as exceptional home cooking. In the many meals I've had there I have had the pleasure of eating pate, lamb tagine, curry (not for the faint hearted), roast lunch and much, much more.
Another key point is the fact that it's dog friendly although beware; your dog will have to get on with Benjamin the resident, fluffy, border collie that roams around later in the evening. They will also have to cope with copious cuddles from Megan; one of the girls that works in the bar.
If you're looking for some good fun and a bit of a laugh to go with your meal then I can highly recommend the quiz that takes place on the first Thursday of every month. Prizes range from wine to bin bags via chocolate and cash. Rounds are on a variety of topics including beer and cakes, music and obscure baby photos.
So in conclusion, if you want a lovely pub in a picturesque setting with the possibility of some excellent food and the guarantee of a warm welcome then you will struggle to find somewhere better than the lamb.
TFB
It first attracted out attention by virtue of the fact that it had a thatched roof. Quaint to the point of cliché but still rather fun. It appeared to be the social hub of a small community consisting largely of thatched buildings.
Initially we just went in for drinks. Inside I was delighted to find good ale at a reasonable price. More importantly, it had a warm and friendly atmosphere. However, while the inside was lovely, the real show-stopper was the outside. As well as the thatched roof and the ample car park there is an absolutely gorgeous garden complete with some very friendly rabbits (whose numbers bear no relation to the specials board). In the summer it's a glorious place to spend some time with a couple of pints.
Like our first contact with the Black Prince, our first contact was enough to have us wanting more. If the settings and drinks weren't enough, the menu was positively seductive. It has subsequently become a firm favourite and one of our regular haunts
Now on to the food bit; it's spectacular. Good, hearty country fare was the order of the day. It was beautifully cooked and elegantly presented. Better still, the portions were huge. There's no chance of still feeling hungry at the end of your meal! Style-wise; it is best described as exceptional home cooking. In the many meals I've had there I have had the pleasure of eating pate, lamb tagine, curry (not for the faint hearted), roast lunch and much, much more.
Another key point is the fact that it's dog friendly although beware; your dog will have to get on with Benjamin the resident, fluffy, border collie that roams around later in the evening. They will also have to cope with copious cuddles from Megan; one of the girls that works in the bar.
If you're looking for some good fun and a bit of a laugh to go with your meal then I can highly recommend the quiz that takes place on the first Thursday of every month. Prizes range from wine to bin bags via chocolate and cash. Rounds are on a variety of topics including beer and cakes, music and obscure baby photos.
So in conclusion, if you want a lovely pub in a picturesque setting with the possibility of some excellent food and the guarantee of a warm welcome then you will struggle to find somewhere better than the lamb.
TFB
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
